G.C. Waldrep

after brueghel

the antecedent
burning
its trial transcript
repercussion
of the azalea’s
gift-lease
in autumn
the slow meters
(“old voice”)
vetted for tourism’s
blurred syllable
contrapuntal
(if not discrete)
belaying
the adjectives
& all their vows
vows I woke from
as for some
milk the honey
gestured towards
some
nourishment
among the ashes

sobriety calendar

the glass comma
bearing its pause

out before it,
like the lamp
it somehow
silences—

a better story,
even the April ice
kneels into
it, as if listening—

as if in unknowing
generosity
(the generosity
of unknowing)—

& how the body
processes
all it isn’t,
tangent to all it is

the pause the body
includes, drapes
its crude self
around—

its body-self—

still puzzled
by the fact of glass,
its
backlit vortices—

prolepsis

as a model of must—

dispersed between
examples,
the truth
remains doubled—

anonymous,
the voice
directs its warrant,

lends its human
half—
its outer surgery—

to the tension
that is
nothing’s
ulterior pattern—

the process
by which the stone
is rolled away,

its must
vs. its mercy—

& the order—
strewn amid frost,
agented inside
a query’s strict

decay, unabsolved—

nor of contempt
this compact body—

G.C. Waldrep’s most recent books include feast gently (Tupelo, 2018), winner of the William Carlos Williams Award from the Poetry Society of America, and The Opening Ritual (Tupelo, 2024), one of the New York Times’s five best poetry collections of 2024. Waldrep taught creative writing and literature at the University of Iowa, Deep Springs College, Kenyon College, and Bucknell University, from which he retired in 2025. He lives in Mercersburg, Pa.

Editors’ Notes (Posit 42)

 

Welcome to Posit 42, featuring visual art and literature that integrates innovation with interrelation, challenge with resonance, and discomfort with grace.

Despite the aesthetic and substantive diversity of these works, all of them can be understood to probe “the nomenclature of / the in-between” (Eléna Rivera, almost never seen as it really is) in search of “some / nourishment / among the ashes” (G.C. Waldrep, after brueghel). In these “strange times indeed” (Evan D. Williams, Untitled, etc.) when “the world is in a perilous state” (Orchid Tierney, dear dr. Williams:: to Marcia), it might seem that “the easy thing / is to untouch the world” (Mike Bagwell, oracular optimism). But these works offer another alternative, one fashioned from “[a]rmatures, birth tusks, suspension points, ornamental vines, levitation, lament” (Evan D. Williams, Experimental Poetry) to “find the sea / that has always been / under our lives” (Evan D. Williams, oracular optimism) — or, in Tamara Kostianovsky’s fabric carcasses, and David Webster’s medical imaging-inspired canvases, under the skin.

Mike Bagwell’s Poem of Thanks: The Reversed Star shows us in “real time” that the substance of a poem, like minerals in seawater, can be suspended within the constant flow and rush of living: “a hex against the pauses in poetry / and in the writing of poetry / be there no more pauses henceforth.” For here is the extraordinary intimacy of an extended meditation that takes heart from its interruptions. We encounter a poet-father yearning to erase the boundaries between his inner ruminations and the vital, vivid moment in which his child abides: “how many traps I’ve built / for my body to be alone / with its thoughts / and even more elaborate ones for it to be alone without them / hey blueberry eyes my daughter says / to herself in the fridge photo.” Leaps, juxtapositions, and unexpected images abound in these short-lined passages, “forgetting the soul’s purpose as if / that’s a bad thing as if my pouring / out of water back into the sky / is not the most divine theft,” all pointing to the pulse of human connection.

James Butler-Gruett plays freely and hilariously with idiom, expertly and consecutively flipping expectations: “God’s not closing the door / but he is flicking the door stopper spring / so it sounds like a woodpecker’s stutter — my favorite season.” In “Opposum Coroner,” the poet writes a wickedly funny small treatise (a treat!) on death, ranging from the Opposum Coroner itself, who “crumples up another autopsy report” to three poet friends texting “not the same as hate … much funnier” about a despised mutual acquaintance they heard on a famous show, to Lazarus himself “whom the Gospels tell us wore linen / because when you’re rotting who cares about wrinkles.” Butler-Gruett wickedly pinpoints the quirks and generally hidden secrets of our lives: “Like everyone else I practice smiling in the car … because someone said / It improves your mood / one of those people we know / Against our will in short bursts.” Even our flimsy self-defenses are skewered with dry and insightful wit: “But Jim says there’s a kind of grape they make / injected with flavor to taste like bubblegum / and my every pretense drops against my will / The sugar lift of something new I’m waiting / Only forever to find something to live for.”

Nancy Cohen’s paper works have the impressive presence of revered paintings or tapestries. One can imagine them variously gracing the walls of a castle, invigorating a museum or warming a public space where the viewers are in need of human connection. Saturated with color and texture, they strike the viewer as multi-dimensional, engaging an enveloping haptic sensibility in response to the paper’s rough and textured surface as well as its light and translucent qualities. Intrinsic to the work, Cohen’s line drawing in paper pulp is remarkable for its delicacy and freedom, creating powerful abstractions that yet remind us of our natural environment, its rivers, trees and perhaps even the smallest of our concerns, as Cohen says, “an insect wing, a bit of lichen.” Cohen centers her work on the line between “our fragile bodies and our fragile environment” which are “inextricably linked.” These pieces gracefully dance on the line, so essential to our moment, between expression and contemplation.

In this excerpt from her new book, other islands, Valerie Coulton conjures lyrics of deep and delicate grace to evoke the blurred lines between loss and love, pain and solace. Interweaving italicized quotations from an ailing mother with the poignant familiarity of “twenty-five boxes of Jell-O,” a “white azalea,” a “black vase,” and “honest knives at ease / side by side,” these haiku-like verses contemplate the generative comforts of house, home, and family alongside their inevitable loss. As tender and intimate as they are contemplative and universal, Coulton’s sensorially grounded stanzas vibrate with psychological and metaphysical resonances as elusive as “the green of something / just outside the frame” when there is “always something moving in the dirt / in the unconscious.” Informed by an appreciation of the interconnectedness of all things and animated by the heightened senses of an observer acutely aware that experience is as fleeting as it is precious, these serene meditations accept and mourn the cycles of making and loss that define our lives.

Elizabeth Dodd’s smart and adventurous prose poem series featured here, From the Workbook for the Interpretation of Dreams, rides the boundary between sleep and waking, looking for (and finding) the lace-like fusions of memory and narrative, the past and the present, the act of writing and the mind’s free wanderings: “Tonight, the memory feels almost like dreaming: the detached attention resting in the pillowy dark, the pique pinned for replay like a private meme.” The poet follows her workbook’s prompts into “the brain’s club-hopping REM cycles” and out again to the first hours after a bad dream when “the details melt. Suffering becomes a concept, the dream’s sharp-wire awareness dulled.” Dodd draws our attention to what is masked by the pressures of daily consciousness—that the narrative of a life is built equally in night’s dreaming, whether remembered or not. In the pages of her intrepid workbook, the thrill of a more edgeless and kinetic consciousness arises: “It’s like a hand-drawn flip book, your thumb strumming the pages, ppppprrrrrrrbbbb—done.”

In Corwin Ericson’s mythic worlds, familiar creatures and objects transform, and each asks an existential question. In “Never Turn Your Back on the Ocean,” the poet imagines “ a life raft on your lawn,” asking, in a point of view seldom considered, “ if you were a baby just delivered /… you would wonder / what now? This is the world? Is it just all rafts / and breakers? Hooks and chum?” In “Duck Song,” we wonder, is it the duck itself or the hunter who is playing the “last song?” And in “Fledgling,” the narrator learns to fly on their own living carpet: “After its first molt / Its markings emerge — / braided animals, squarish flowers. / As it dreams, its fringe flutters.” “Brechtian” is the story of a hat’s metamorphosis in a possible love relationship where the main character will “be betrayed by the woman / who has put on his hat / who’s singing now —” The what-ifs in these tales posit another way of being, in places known, yet strangely unknown, to us. Each poem makes us wish to be there to delight in the strangeness. “Here swims the seventh swan. The next world will be feathered.”

With a mix of buoyant spontaneity and stately rhythms, Pearl Kan’s beguiling poem cycle Empty makes a case for quietude. The poems seem to emanate from a voice resistant to the noise of speech, searching for a way to exit the hurly burly of language while still committed to its music: “I held the sound I am looking / for and found out it was /far off and is /shelter in a cup /wrapped / If it was given it is lost.” The poems all begin with the line “I came at him empty” (a quote from Chinese philosopher Zhuangzi); under the spell of this lyric refrain, they overlap and harmonize in an ongoing meditation on emptiness: “I use the word I know / to try at it / To try the name of it / To try at the aim of it.” If Kan’s lines tend toward hesitation and fragmentation, they also ring with imaginative assurance. Kan suggests that to be quiet is to linger in presences: “Enter softly the hour / is full of animals / and dull soft pieces of sea glass.” These delicate ponderings prise open one door after another to tender engagements with our world: “You can lift little sunrise / tend to it with butter /and milk such soft / devices.”

Tamara Kostianovsky’s body of work is the body itself in Merleau-Ponty’s expansive notion of the “flesh of the world.” The title of one iconic fabric carcass with lush leaves and flowers, rather than bloody, violated organs in its splayed interior, is “The Body is the Landscape:” a concise manifesto for this artist’s oeuvre and a signpost towards the uncanny blend of animal and vegetal as well as generative and violent referents that arouse such delight and unease in the viewer. The human element is layered literally as well as figuratively over her unification of animal and plant components by the artist’s use of discarded clothing to fashion (!) the layers of reconceptualized flesh her sculptures expose. Kostianovsky’s use of fabric once worn to protect and conceal human bodies in order to reveal and comment upon the interconnectedness of what’s beneath the skin complicates and deepens this work’s beautiful and disturbing challenge to the distinctions and boundaries we might otherwise take for granted.

With these collaborations by David Lehman and the late, great David Shapiro, we get a glimpse into the playful erudition and poetic chops of two seasoned and accomplished poets. On display are an array of talents and interests that both overlap and rhyme, metaphorically as well as literally. These poems touch on poetics, philosophy, humor, high and low culture, po-biz shoptalk, and above all, play – via formal constraint, wordplay, rhyme, and the call and response process of collaboration itself. Moving with ease and grace between irony and imaginative flights of lyricism, Shapiro offers: “Poetry is not a game, nor is it a dream. / But poetry is a big dream and full of vertigo. / Poetry… or have I said too much already? Be compact,” to which Lehman responds: “All poems lead to the highway (my way). / . . . Vertigo is a dream that contains the index of forgotten books.” In “Poem in a Chinese Form,” the two revisit the question of games with winsome lyricism: “The dead live in the game of our youth / Like a child’s game, but what are the rules? // . . . An amphitheater of the angels.” These poems are animated by the palpable presence of friendship — Shapiro’s slightly deflating observation that “Love is friendship with flash” notwithstanding. Scattered throughout the wit and “flash” enlivening these “loose villanelles,” “four by fours,” and aphorisms are potent moments of transcendence that “[i]nto the aurora let a star burst // A star-birth / And thousands of butterflies.”

The title of one of Eléna Rivera’s lyrically uneasy, contemplative poems featured here, “Almost never seen as it really is,” distills the poet’s fascination with the limits of perception: “as if I haven’t just / walked backwards / into reality.” The poems’ lines examine the slippery, fervent work of our senses as we struggle to penetrate a reality outside our own frame: “How difficult to keep the eye fixed on a point / When there’s a multitude of selves / a palette of them.” If these poems locate our love/hate relationship with the real in “the mass hysteria of matter,” they also find something tender in perception’s blur: “All lights all darks / can lose brightness / & end with our falling in love.” Encountering a sculpture, a color’s shadow, or a tree branch, Rivera claims for herself (and for us) a kind of exaltation: “I mean to be thrilled by a garden /or a line a building makes.” In Rivera’s lyrics nothing, no matter how closely attended to, is “seen as it really is” but the most complex dimensions of looking are always palpable.

With stunning physicality of language and image, Orchid Tierney’s series of epistolary poems dance as if before a sharded mirror reflecting the experiences of the poet herself melded with those of William Carlos Williams: “the doctor in you is always reading the signs :: but you cannot escape your glass :: even the grass is screaming while the glass birds have fallen silent.” Addressed in their titles to dear dr. Williams and in their bodies to a “you” who seems to be, at least in part, an amalgam of Williams and a contemporary (female) poet, they consider faith, inspiration, death, grief, guilt, and especially the relationship of the poetic process to the mundanities of daily life. For artists like Williams and Tierney’s narrator, simply filling up the gas tank or driving over a pothole catalyzes a poem, along with their ambition: “you desire to be the definition :: but you are too ganglion to define tradition :: the gloopy slime of the pond will ensnare any wheel who dares to follow your motor.” Meanwhile, outside the window, the scene can be ominous: “the bulldozers in the clearing” have chased away “the cuckoo :: the hawk :: the crow.” But Tierney also sees signs of hope. The birds, she writes, “have found another place to sing,” and “your grief taps the window :: but deer insist on feeding :: with you here enduring.”

In these rich and tightly packed lyric meditations by G.C. Waldrep, the poet measures a profound faith in materiality as a manifestation of the divine against the rigors of poetic interrogation. The stepwise movement of “after brueghel” from an “antecedent / burning / its trial transcript” to a speaker who “woke” for “some / nourishment / among the ashes” calls to mind the Dutch/Flemish master’s Parable of the Sower whose seeds are scattered from soilless path to rocky ground to good soil. In the poem’s version, the spiritual seeds are borne by the “slow meters” of “old voice” shape note singing, although Waldrep’s poems eschew the rough authenticity of that tradition in favor of stately architectures of chiseled grace and formidable conviction. In “sobriety calendar,” we are offered an alternative to body-soul duality by the “backlit vortices” of glass, whose materiality encompasses its own transcendence much like the human vessel “drap[ing] / its crude self / around” “all it isn’t, / tangent to all it is.” Analogous dualities are rejected in “prolepsis,” in which the spiritual truth “dispersed between / examples” is presented as a “must,” like the Resurrection’s evidence for the present’s incorporation of a transcendent future. In the same way, the theological souls of these poems are inextricable from their masterful intellectual and prosodic embodiment.

John Walser perceives detail with an acute attention that manifests as love. In this suite of poems, every image captures the tone of winter: “the cold like a crow’s beak / and “how breathing labors and labors / like lugging limestone.” Both time and the ineffable quality of the season are somehow precisely limned in: “Look how four o’clock high / the chemical sun burning the blue cold is.” And surely every reader has at some time wondered “Why does the freight train whistle / from beyond the city count today / as a sound of nature?” Or we believe we have done so, having read Walser’s words. In “John Coltrane Lush Life for Julie,” we journey from outside to in, where making chicken broth becomes an actual love poem in every ounce of process: the melting of the chicken skin, the meat falling from the bones, “let (ting) the fat rise and harden / then I’ll crack it like thin lake ice / stepped on, ridden on / breaking under its own weight.” This poem reiterates the poet’s desire and ours: “I want you to come home: / to be amazed by the plasma / the breathable broth air.”

David Webster’s wide-ranging oeuvre is unified by the primacy of process: the restless, unending tides of becoming and unbecoming that animate art-making, as well as life on the macro and micro scales on which he works. Webster’s work blurs boundaries, or perhaps, reveals their inevitable blurriness, in part by revealing interconnections: between abstraction and referentiality, painting and sculpture; but also between function and disease, cells and torsos, hair and muscles. His layering of line and form with spare but striking color accents generates worlds entire unto themselves, replete with question and suggestion, stability and change. Permeated by a sense of dedication to craft as well as to art writ large, these works bring to mind the great Modern experimentations of Picasso and Klee, as well as Michelangelo’s sensually charged physicality. The pleasure of experiencing their craft and refinement is weighted and deepened by a pervasive if inchoate sense of loss.

With wit and a light touch of irony, Evan D. Williams cleverly directs/misdirects the reader by titles that hint at more complex stories, some of which we may guess. Two of his titles are definitions of art; certainly, “Experimental Poetry” makes the reader think twice, opening with: “Introduction: Two planets in one house with no running water.” Later references to ‘Mismade Girls’ and John the Baptist as possibly the first-ever conceptual artist add enjoyable angles to these convoluted meditations. Other poems employ other voices and modes of language, like the Biblical-sounding yet unfathomable “excerpt” of “True Escape,” “From whence sharks have increas’d; for shark doth seize my shark—shiv shiver.” Still, there are nuggets of hard reality in this imaginative and seemingly light-hearted work: “Everything that needs to be said has already been said. But since no one was listening, everything must be sold. We can try again, America. Give up the depraved man amongst you. Unbind the bird boy.”

Thank you for being here to experience and support the work of these wonderful artists.

Susan Lewis, Carol Ciavonne, Bernd Sauermann, and Barbara Tomash

G.C. Waldrep

exilic topos

the pollen’s spark hidden in the air’s tongue

anterior to the presence that commands begin

in outline, an absence disappearing into voice

shadow-grid, concealed but not unobtainable

Tye River

(1)

light frost, its cincture

the fragrant invisible
at large
among the wheatfolds
a lucid finitude:
golden seals
the weather breaks

(2)

in priory, a held motion
succors
debt’s visible passage

shoaled with all
the organs of mourning

(3)

pity the dull orchard
its sleep-vestry
propped against Art

the mending-flame
or macular escarpment
pronouncing

the hawk’s ablative

(4)

enlaced with hoarfrost
the zodiac glides
to your filament-feet

or, suffer a firmament—

(5)

steady the lamp, friend
steady
the lengthening shadow

metric for flame

Northumberland

living memory of the ash-tree
groping, lending itself
to the gaze’s syllable-descant,

its instant, flung (as if away)

*

winter’s surface, its republic—

 

audible lamp reconnoitering

nucleus of means

the quince at dusk
expressing
its hitherto, its after—

its brief for change

(say it keeps a diary,
a voice
it supersedes)

dwelling beneath
the acknowledgment
of the staved
work, to which
the “truth of things”
condescends—

declines its own
belief in shadows—

nucleus of means
“the work”
(i.e. the vocation)

harvest
of the quince’s
bitter fruit, reversal

paring the terms
from mock solitude—

that wager
of, it would seem,
affirmation—

(or of its shadow)—

G.C. Waldrep’s most recent books are feast gently (Tupelo, 2018), winner of the William Carlos Williams Award from the Poetry Society of America, and The Earliest Witnesses (Tupelo/Carcanet, 2021). Recent work has appeared in APR, Poetry, Paris Review, New England Review, The Nation, Yale Review, Colorado Review, New American Writing, Conjunctions, and other journals. Waldrep lives in Lewisburg, Pa., where he teaches at Bucknell University.

Editors’ Notes (Posit 37)

 

Welcome to Posit 37!

This issue showcases the generative energy of assemblage, juxtaposing a range of encounters with nature and culture, body and spirit, bringing humor and gravitas to bear on the human condition in a “world not long for this world” (Andrew Zawacki, “Droste Effect”).

On the literary side, we pursue our interest in the elasticity of poetic forms, including the prose poem, the cento, the sonnet, and a number of new approaches to the line and the field, while from the visual arts we bring together a text and photography amalgam, two radically disparate approaches to sculpture, and a set of drawings inspired by Samuel Beckett’s Happy Days.

These works revel in the “echo and bounce” of word and image (Karen Holman, “Fishing Boats on the Beach at Saintes-Marie”) to remind us how “the mote & motley” of our existence (Charles Byrne, “things could always be worse”) can “refreshen the void” (Mark DeCarteret, “The Year We Went Without Fables”). Enacting art’s capacity to descry “the fragrant invisible / at large / among the wheatfolds” (G.C. Waldrep, “Tye River”) these works turn “the power of the mind . . . that searches for links” (Susanne Dyckman, “&”) to the task of discovering how “the darkness at the center of darkness . . . may be another kind of light” (Jeff Friedman, “Done Time”).

Nancy Bowen’s sculptures recombine a range of organic, artificial, and cultural components to construct boundary-defying alternatives to our most basic assumptions. With wit and exuberance, Bowen’s totems juxtapose forms and materials, references and resonances that challenge the lines between abstract and representational, natural and crafted, ornamental and functional, sacred and profane. In organic constructions evocative of rocks and vines grafted onto utensils and shrines, Bowen generates an iconography rooted in the experiential qualities of the female body. Bowen’s incorporation of chairs and chains, beads and breasts, shells and glass ground the erudition and sensual energy of these assemblages, while her marriage of elements both ancient and modern, functional and sybaritic generate a uniquely synthetic vision.

Charles Byrne’s beautifully synced and variegated language draws on remembered poems, axioms, and slang, fascinating the reader with magnificent turns of thought and story, as if “borne aloft single-scruffed, limbs shimmering in wriggles, / a confusion of neuronal launches as from a McDonald’s / single-handled fry funnel to pentagonal prism packet.” Both philosophy and wit combine in ways we all might find familiar: “i would have given the shirt | off my back | had i ever been asked | but in truth | in fact | have i ever really | done anything for anyone?” Yet Byrne’s work, dense in imagery and meaning, encompasses an ironic honesty that reflects our human tenderness and vulnerability: “my body reacts in apocalyptic fashion to the loss of sense, as does my self. my efforts to anatomize leave only scatterings of atoms, akin to how my toothbrush simply breaks into bittier and bittier indivisible parts in the pacific garbage patch.” Still, the empathy and linguistic variety of this poet’s work helps to alleviate the despair it so vividly evokes.

Like the monumental inflatable sculptures for which she is renowned, Nancy Davidson’s new drawings pulsate with a vibrant simplicity that is manifoldly evocative and impossible to pin down. Pared down to essential biomorphic abstractions yet gesturally dynamic, these bilateral, braced, and weighted forms bring to mind inanimate figures like knots, balls and chains, and balloons, as well as cultural references such as the spread legs of cowgirls or ancient female idols. But above all, these works evoke the body: bringing to mind legs and heads, fallopian tubes and ovaries, testicles, nipples, and other erogenous knobs. As such, they evoke our life force: at once vulnerable and resilient, vibrant and comical, yet tinged with a whiff of the grotesque, as befits their inspiration by Beckett’s Happy Days. These energetic drawings speak not only to Davidson’s ground-breaking body of work, but to the absurd and valiant determination with which Winnie grasps at the fleeting imprisonment in a sinking body that is her only reprieve from the abyss.

Mark DeCarteret’s prose poem series featured here addresses “doing without” in a flurry of contexts, both personal and planetary — engaging retrospect, loss, deprivation, and necessity to identify what is essential and what is not. Like “a monster sun though not big on details” committed to “getting it right,” these irreverently witty meditations on a world in which “mighty oaths from little acrimonies grow” rant in staccato, rat-a-tat rhythms laden with an irony as thick as “dense winter fog.” Lyrical interludes (“colors slow-heated, steeping like tea, or cooled off and foolishly seen for themselves, charmed back to earth”) bring out the rhythmic zing of DeCarteret’s barbed insights into “this mess we’ve recreated” in which “there’s more than enough room for no one. What fun. O what fun.”

Sharon Dolin’s cento-sonnets are at once artful tributes and worthy heirs to the artistry of their source poets, offering all that those writers could hope for in these marvelously recombined fragments of their own voices. Dolin captures the spirit of each, and adds the fertile imagination of her own poetically “green green hands.” From Ruth Stone’s grief-tinged “ too much salt, burned edges” to a dangerous Plath, “Let there be snakes / rayed round a candle flame,” these poems brim with unforgettable images and lyric energy, offering a series of wondrous gifts in sonnet boxes like “some angel-shape worth wearing / with one tin eye.”

In Susanne Dyckman’s delightfully intelligent poems from After Affects, “the power and weight of the mind” resounds “as the joy of a forgotten treasure,” and, paradoxically, as “a study in weightlessness.” With the flexible, patterned, and weightless strength of a dancer, the poet wants to “push back the curtains and lay down embarrassed by so many dead flowers.” Repetitions abound — fascinating footwork that prepares us for italicized language fragments leaping across the bottom of the page — “left on the skin       the trick     of nature       I can almost hear.” While engaging head-on with the elemental — time, memory, nature, and the possibility of transformation — these poems, like our thoughts upon waking, are hushed and circular. Dyckman reminds us that limitation is also part and parcel with strength — “the mind that can change too little on its own, that cannot alter stone.”

Jeff Friedman’s prose poems conjure worlds in single paragraphs and individual characters in sentences. In these precisely observed and recounted micro-moments of an examined life, the physical detail conveys volumes. Enlisting defamiliarization to power perception and the manifest to reveal what lies beneath, Friedman casts his closely focused, unhurried gaze on the granularities of our deepest drive, to “let your mind raise its voice.” In their plain-spoken clarity, these poems are “done talking nonsense” and “done with the darkness at the center of darkness,” casting their lucid gaze on the ephemeral physicality of communication and what it means to lose it.

In his text and image series, Doug Hall yokes together meditations on time and memory with black and white photographs of the winter oaks of Olompali Valley. From “among the oaks,” Hall conjures the collapsing universe; the DNA of slugs, bananas, honeybees; the difference between “melodic memory” and “studied memory;” and our most distant star, Earendel. Hall has created a series of juxtaposing diptychs, each block of text chiming with the shape of the photographs. Framed centrally and filling the image with a single tree’s distinctive intricate branchings — some reaching for the sky, others heavily skimming the earth — the photographs dramatically accentuate each oak’s individuality. In his pairings, Hall suggests that the oaks have a way of approaching existence akin and parallel to our own. Hasn’t each tree responded to the forces of time and memory in an ongoing relationship to sky, sun, water, insects, nutrients? How else could the oaks persist, uniquely present in a changing landscape?

In Jeffrey Hecker’s Monopoly series, America, or perhaps its self-image, is reflected in a fun-house mirror warped by the quaintness of the game’s iconography as it dovetails with the harsh — and often comical — realities of 21st century America. Drawing upon the game’s association with wholesome American family bonds as well as its unfiltered capitalistic values, these poems render the absurd contradictions at the core of the American experiment, juxtaposing daycares and unemployment offices, luxury spas and homeless shelters, Truman Capote and Linda Ronstadt, Dodge Durangos and dust devils to drily comical effect. One poem even reminds us of the Ur-American utopianism of social experiments such as an “experimental village” in which an “empathy hierarchy” replaces those based on the materialistic metric at the foundation of the iconic game.

Karen Holman’s expert ear for sound — brief, abrupt, dazzling, and fulfillingly descriptive, excites the mind and invites the heart. In “Invoking the Inconsolable Divine,” she defines the divine as, among other things, the “ninety-nine named / and galaxy crowned / vaped, empty-bottle, recycled, / wretched, fetching, festering, / quotidian, misquoted and doting” as well as, wittily, the “crapshoot / radiant radical / sporadic and random / specific, fixer and fix.” In “Constellations,” she imagines the questions of our existence tangent to the stars: “chartreuse-new / seven sisters, veiled / in their own breath / opened and blinked / beating like my fist-wings / with a treasure in it.” The textures of earth are also invoked: “sleep is houndstooth / sky-forsythia / cemetery pinwheel flowers / animated, again / by air like us.” In Holman’s image-charged poems, the ineffable abides with the quotidian, the divine with the earthly, as if suspended together in our memories and dreams.

Marie de Quatrebarbesprose poems from The Vitals, translated by Aiden Farrell, interrogate language and its fraught relationship to the referents that we consider reality: the “fiction to which we can only respond with a nod when a vague idea, a very vague idea, vaporous even, comes to snatch it away.” These cerebral notes-to-self are like a diary written in radioactive ink, aiming their x-ray vision right through daily life to discover “The Vitals” — or expose what we assume them to be (“the afternoon, the children…”) as “a sort of ecstasy, delusion of ownership.” These linguistically packed and provocative poems favor disruption, applying the chosen uncertainty of their magic to put “on a drama of the abst. incompletion of a certain img” in order to “provoke uncert. fate.”

Judith Roitman’s spare, bold, and sometimes unnerving poems cut to the point immediately, asking without hesitation what we might hesitate to probe. Do you feel this? How can you not? Proceeding from the mysterious and somehow accurate description of birth, when we are “expelled from the body / like donuts / like trees,” Roitman asks, in the eerie “Shimmy:” “Do you come here often / Do you shimmy in darkness / Do you feed them,” capturing both a real and surreal human experience. Her brilliant response to an oft-asked question: “I asked poetry: what are you / and it slapped me in the face,” generates both more poetry and more questions for the reader. In “Language,” a view from a plane shows “midden upon midden below us,” and demands an important, perhaps profound, answer from us: “A whale is on the beach. / A crab reaches its destiny / Two dead seals on the sand — can you see this? / What language do you speak?”

Elise Siegel’s haunting sculptures evoke both airy modern portraits and heroic busts from an ancient culture, eroded by the rain and wind of centuries, as if rediscovered, but with no clue as to where they originated. These faces have the immediacy of selfies, but the psychological complexity of ritual masks, or the inner presence of oracles. Using clay as her material (perhaps the most historical of mediums) the artist imbues these gestural sculptures with individual lives and expressions even as we imagine a process of erosion gradually and minutely continuing the process of destruction. In these sculptures, we see our friends as well as our ancestors. It is as if these women are icons whose names are forgotten in history, but like a fleeting glimpse of a stranger’s smile on the street, or the felt dignity of a statue of a Jomon goddess, they have a timeless quality. Siegel’s powerful work compels us to believe that there is a life force particular to women’s spirit that survives the ages.

In these poems from Lost in Translation, Alison Stone has married the cento form with an iterated translation procedure to make collages not from others’ excerpted lines but from their repeatedly re-translated progeny. The resulting poems trouble and broaden our notions of authorship, reminding us of the range of choices it entails, even while offering a collectivized notion of creation that encompasses, with the poet’s use of Google Translate, more than human agency. At the same time, Stone’s aesthetics and sensibility unite these poems, permeating them with her sharp insight (“There are two types of disasters: women and men”), elegiac lyricism (“The world is your widow and she is still crying”), and warnings of our threat to our own planet: “The tide wave has opened, and everywhere.” As she drily observes, now that “the wind has been unhinged lately. / Alarm, and fire approaching. / When it comes, the landscape will listen” and “Twitter viewers swallow the sky.”

In these exquisitely worded poems, a powerful and invisible something is always behind, within, and surrounding the object of G. C. Waldrep’s nature-focused lens; a force made almost visible in “the pollen’s spark hidden in the air’s tongue” which is “anterior to the presence that commands begin” a force outside of us, but “not unobtainable.” In “Tye River,” the river reveals variants of its true nature, sometimes tragic; “a held motion” that “succors / debt’s visible passage / shoaled with all / the organs of mourning” but encompassing, pulsing, alive and beautiful, as “enlaced with hoarfrost / the zodiac glides / to your filament-feet.” This force also animates “the quince at dusk / expressing / its hitherto, its after—” and in “its brief for change” the bitter fruit may hold the “affirmation” or more subtly, and mysteriously, the “shadow” of affirmation, of a power that we sense, even if we cannot entirely grasp.

In these grave and erudite prose poems from These Late Eclipses, Andrew Zawacki considers the ways eclipses — that is, “figurations wherein a trace conceals, or cancels out, the whole” — characterize the threatened state of the nesting-doll-like layers of reality in which we live. From Vegas to Verkhoyansk, from family intimacies to the theoretical cloud of celestial bodies surrounding our solar system, Zawacki catalogues the iterated signs of distress everywhere in evidence, not least to our psyches, when “under a hematoma sun, everyone I know’s been broken down, like a cardboard box.” These brilliant poems urge us to recognize the grave danger in which we find ourselves, this 11th hour in which “dark is swooning in” to a “world not long for this world.”

We hope you love these as much as we do.

Thank you for being here!

Susan Lewis, Carol Ciavonne, Bernd Sauermann, and Barbara Tomash

G. C. Waldrep

Exodus

—after Jean Dubuffet

You could have said flame but you did not.
You could have said roof but did not.
You could have said light-bearing roof
beneath which a house crouches
you could have crushed pearls into powder
you could have struck a match.
You could have said prayer but you did not.

Twombly

parallel descending motions
“insatiable little gardens”

a machine holds the tongue
by its root

 

it’s you, you’re the machine

—line 2 is quoted from Friederike Mayröcker, Études, trans. Donna Stonecipher

Poor Souls’ Light

where & what is green
the bone strikes, honeycombed
frost-crowned perigee
 

 
the womb has no bone
runs the thief’s rhymed ecology

& therefore no secret solace
 
 
 
I profess my blue coin
in the tine-orchard, my book
set into the crux
of the most ancient testimony

G.C. Waldrep’s most recent books are feast gently (Tupelo, 2018), winner of the William Carlos Williams Award from the Poetry Society of America, and The Earliest Witnesses, forthcoming from Tupelo and Carcanet (in the UK) in January 2021. Newer work has appeared in APR, Poetry, Paris Review, New England Review, Yale Review, Iowa Review, Colorado Review, New American Writing, Conjunctions, etc. Waldrep lives in Lewisburg, Pa., where he teaches at Bucknell University and edits the journal West Branch.

Editors’ Notes (Posit 25)

 

Here we are in September of 2020, with millions of people sick and dying worldwide as a result of the confluence of two deadly pandemics, one biological and the other political, even as great swathes of the United States are burning or flooding, and the nation careens towards one of the most consequential elections in its history (so please, please, VOTE). So we thought you needed a little gift. Putting Posit 25 together has been a bright spot in our days, when those have sometimes seemed few and far between, and we hope it will have the same effect on you.

In times like these, when “the fires burn with bodies” (Darren Demaree, The Field Party #1) and “the carnage is everywhere” (makalani bandele, unit_84), art may be a balm, but it is no frivolity. As contributor Hiroyuki Hamada has put it: “As our world continues to be subservient to the hierarchy of money and violence, I believe the exploration of artists to perceive the world reaching beyond the framework of corporatism, colonialism and militarism continues to be a crucial part of being human.”

Each of the stellar contributors to this very special issue may be at a different stage of their trajectory – from previously unpublished (Marije Bouduin) to rising star (makalani bandele, Thaddeus Rutkowski) to celebrated master (Erica Baum, G.C. Waldrep, Hiroyuki Hamada) – but, as you will see, each and every one of them is at the top of their game.

The free-jazz-inflected musicality of makalani bandele’s prose units supplants even as it illuminates the bankrupt elitism underlying conventional distinctions between the erudite and the colloquial. Glowing with a bold and breathless energy, these prose poems are playful as well as unflinching in their engagement with the racism baked into contemporary American life, in which “the carnage is everywhere” and “people say ‘no one’ all the time, when actually they mean ‘no one white.’” Having “located this tributary about a stone’s throw away from some postmodernity,” bandele’s prose poems “vibing in a landscape of contradictions” “economize form to go faster” until their “stories are flames.”

A deep but light-handed resonance underpins Erica Baum’s celebrated series, Dog Ears. Baum’s photographs of folded-down pages from unidentifiable books tease us with what they conceal as well as reveal, tempting us to infer what we cannot decipher while frustrating the urge to uncover what they have made inaccessible. The textures and typeface in these photographs only enhance our awareness of the tactile quality of the printed page, even as they place it definitively out of reach. The artist’s loving disruption of her source materials leads the viewer beyond the urge to resolve the ambiguities created by their fragmentation to embrace the new wholes forged by her juxtapositions and syntheses. Baum thus transforms her source materials into indelible artifacts whose effect is to offer and withhold at once, giving us no choice but to accept and build upon the ambiguous and fragmentary nature of communication itself. These powerful new pieces, incorporating references to “tragedy” “prescription” “zoomed” “mask” “spectacle” “dark” “wreck” “Washington” “post office” and more, speak directly to the experience of living in a pandemic that is “getting to all of us . . . facing danger / and the not knowing”.

Celia Bland’s sensual imagery and powerful prosody forge brilliantly unpredictable connections between such apparently disparate subjects as fish and human sexuality, familial and racial identity, horse racing and gun violence, turbulent landings and the assassination of JFK. In ringing and rhythmic language, Flounder’s eponymous narrator speaks not only for the fish “drifting off in the currents,” but for any “flesh” which is “foundered,” which is “blunder.” EX considers skin to explore what is absent, unsaid, or concealed, like the ethnically revealing “sheen of my grandfather’s arms . . . beneath his starched white shirt” despite the traces it leaves on “every armrest, on every tray table, with every scratch.” like bundles of shudders explores the very notion of arousal to forge a chain of associations from one mythos of excitement to another, from the sexualized “horse opera[s] written for the adolescent girl / in the reign of RPM” to guns, both of which are “heart bursting.” Terminaire’s very title evokes both death and flight, going on to link flight turbulence and the suit Jackie Kennedy wore when her husband was assassinated, exposing the ominous threat of “this authentic turbulence– / This Dallas.”

Marije Bouduin’s debut poems celebrate the elusive power of love even as they lament its loss. Ultimately, they evoke the loneliness and isolation of being itself. In a compellingly direct yet lyrical voice, these poems take off from Plato’s theory of the bifurcated hermaphrodites to lament the limitations of connection, even while “[t]he way your hips move impulses an orchestra to form.” In these “collective econom[ies] of variables and adverbs” the poet skillfully “appl[ies] stress to the structure and see[s] what follows,” enticing the reader to “play a game of poem string by string.”

Raymond de Borja’s haunting, gripping epistolary poem to “Dear Jean” posits a “moth-eaten world” — “After Music” — proffering a historical yet alarmingly present intimacy we share as “[t]his very evening, Jean, they are ripping the square apart.” In the world of these poems as in our world, “the riot is our figure and ground.” Like the speaker in We Requested for Some Relaxing Forest Sounds, we too want to plead, “oh please disemplot, one, someone, anyone, point by point from nature…” As this poet brilliantly reveals, even in music and art, “[o]ur mind is the silent ligature between the glass, the ornamental grass, and an idea of enclosure.”

In these powerful and disturbing prose blocks from The Field Party, Darren Demaree returns to Posit with a series of short but breathlessly urgent works about the contemporary state of the United States Midwest, in which “fires burn with bodies as well as they burn with the furniture that once held the bodies” and children are raised “to not fear becoming part of that fire” in which “guns are tucked” and are “always pointed at something.” Meanwhile, Emily As We Let the Faucets Run offers a tightly coiled tribute to the understated and sometimes paradox-infused beauty of domestic intimacy, in which the fact that Emily “can erase” the narrator is “an actual gift.”

In Connor Fisher’s rich, tactile imagery of time present and past, the properties of memory and the distance between what we remember and what we are become something almost concrete, a “strange object.” Although the narrator of Autobiography III observes that “[e]ven shepherds” — whose work is calling as well as duty – “lose their sheep,” this poet’s rare and frank attention to the world he sings puts him in no such danger. An artist of the physical and tangible (“the body [which] smells a bit off,” the ewe and her “fatty, / sweet milk”), Fisher’s calling is to “join together the small pieces of whatever strange object you chose to muster up. . . an article, a partridge, the sweat built up under your arms, a child, the image of the moon in water.” In these poems, “[t]here’s always a rhythm” in which the observation that “the sun’s down” — “[l]ike all the rest” is all we know, and all we need to know.

Gloria Frym’s unique and provocative prose works function as both conceptual meditations and modern morality tales fueled by the author’s unflinching insights into human nature. In Sense, the elusive and persistent question of ‘what is to be done’ is considered from a psychological as well as moral point of view. Whereas the character who doesn’t “sense what needs to be done” and therefore doesn’t “do the thing that needs doing” remains stuck in the same vacuous and inert occupation from which he could not be bothered to budge, the proactive path of the person who knows what needs to be done leads them to a love story “that begins the rest of two lives.” In Recycle, the temptation to betray the narrator’s principles (against treating books with disrespect) gives rise to recursive rationalizations likely to become “the gateway to further moral lapses.”

Situated, by his own description, in a contemporary sociopolitical context of “corporatism, colonialism and militarism,” Hiroyuki Hamada’s imposing and mysterious sculptures are in some respects reminiscent of missiles and bullets, warships and fortresses. However, like ‘swords into ploughshares,’ the freshness and complexity of Hamada’s refined and polished conceptions incorporate these ominous elements into balanced, yet whimsical structures reminiscent of biomorphic forms and even flexible states of matter, like liquids and gels. These are painstakingly crafted sculptures of profound emotional as well as cerebral resonance, as compelling as they are serene.

Working in an extraordinary range of media, from drawing to sculpture to installation to video, Jean Jaffe draws on her interest in psychology, anthropology, literature, and cultural history to create new realities that are as recognizable as they are strange, as beautiful as they are disturbing. This enticing sampling of her output includes clips from her live-action animations of Alice in Wonderland and A Tribute to Tesla, her graceful yet distressing biomorphic sculptural chimeras, her delicate and moving drawings, her whimsical installations inspired by literature such as Remains of the Day and T.S. Eliot’s Four Quartets, and her disturbing reimagining of the tale of Little Red Riding Hood from the wolf’s point of view. No matter the medium or subject, Jaffe’s work is informed by a probing interest in what it means to be alive, imbuing even the most whimsical of her creations with depth and resonance.

Whether working in dry pigment or acrylic and oil, Suejin Jo creates canvases of jewel-like beauty. Working with an intensely saturated, vibrant, and harmonious if often unpredictable color palette, Jo makes use of a wealth of lines, marks, and shapes which range from the geometric to the organic. Exuding a unique combination of order and energy, Jo’s dense canvases are at once serene and immensely dynamic. With their simplicity of composition and richness of detail, these paintings variously evoke nature and artifice, water and light, land and architecture, forging a sense of connection between the viewer and the artist’s quest for the beauty and meaning of what it is to be alive in this world.

Lesle Lewis is a poet of the physical and concrete, miraculously conjoined with the whimsical, like “bottle tipsy . . . sailboat muses . . . and miracle bambinos”. In these poems, teemingly alive in image and movement, the myriad contradictions of our lives are distilled: “I turn the heat on and off a thousand times. I make anti-gravity moves,” and the myriad things of the world need no explanation or irritable reaching: “Let’s let these things be by themselves, not goose-to-goose, duck-to-duck, dog-to-dog, person-to-person, civilization-to-wild, open-to -sanctuary.” Acknowledging the universal if impossible yearning “to float in an infinite present,” Lewis wisely counsels that we “talk about this now before it’s too late and two hour wars become three hundred years.”

Thaddeus Rutkowski’s tale of an evening bicycle ride has the depth of a life cycle and the velocity of the ride itself. Its brilliant, beautifully spare, and precise description reveals the inner and outer life of a narrator physically sure of himself as he navigates city traffic on his way home, avoiding a startled pedestrian who tells him to either “get a light” or “get a life.” Although he knows he does not need the former, he is not so sure about the latter, since even at the end of his journey, “when [he] pass[es] through the last obstacle, [he] will be more or less home.” On the way, near-accidents, misunderstandings, and a police stop chip away at the rider’s spirits, building a dysphoric atmosphere that functions as a subtle commentary on contemporary life – one expressed by the graffiti he notices, declining in hopefulness from “Sarah2 Marry Me” to “sadder words” like “Entropy,” “Self-Obsession,” “Mediocrity,” “Boredom,” “Conflict,” “Revolution.”

Tony Trigilio’s ornate, surreal, and witty prosody makes virtuosic sport of narrative and the language by which it is conveyed. This is the work of “an aesthete whose sacrosanct / observance prickles the highest vanes of clamor.” And yet his pastiche worlds have much in common with our own, on levels both personal: “the desperado inside my Outlook calendar,” and cultural: “The first budgets of the twenty-first century: the poke, the nub, their neo-liberalism.” Dare we hope for a time when “the dominant social group exhausts itself” — even as conditions become more dire, and “’Spontaneity’” [is] replaced by “constraint” in ever less / disguised and indirect forms, in outright police measures”? Even in a possible future world where “[f]rugal parents from Soviet Florida bicker in fumy saloons,” as Trigilio reminds us, “[w]e should’ve known swindlers can pose as subterraneans.”

G.C. Waldrep’s chiseled and luminous ruminations on the work of Jean Dubuffet and Cy Twombly offer a glimpse of their aesthetic affinities with one another, as well as with the poet himself. A potent blend of humility and sophistication comes to mind, as does a demonstrated faith in the power of the artifact to speak for itself. By considering what Dubuffet “could have said” in painting (and titling) Exodus, Waldrep elucidates the richness of suggestion inherent in the image, even as he highlights the painter’s choices: using his notoriously pedestrian materials when he “could have crushed pearls into powder;” depicting exile and displacement when he “could have said light-bearing roof / beneath which a house crouches.” In Twombly, Waldrep’s incorporation of a haunting phrase by Friederike Mayröcker recalls the painter’s search for what he referred to as “the phrase,” and Waldrep’s spare and cryptic lines nod to Twombly’s trailing lines and indecipherable text. By deploying language even while silencing it, Waldrep’s final lines suggest, might Twombly’s inscrutable and often asemic “insatiable little gardens” enact as well as reveal culture’s propensity to “hold the tongue / by its root?” Finally, by invoking the flames lit to remind the faithful to pray for the souls of the poor, Poor Souls’ Light makes its own apt and solemn offering of faith and value to all of us so sorely in need of “secret solace” in these harrowing times.

Stay safe and well, and please VOTE as if your life depends on it — it does.

with love and hope,

Susan Lewis, Carol Ciavonne, and Bernd Sauermann

G.C. Waldrep

first person

draw the empty frames
from their hope chest
(the folded gray uniform
long gone to dust)

wreathed in ash
I fletch the sky’s reed-sister
as if all human
wrongs were never-
helmsmen, never-priests

on Mount Monadnock
I tested the berries
(sweet in summer: True)
against flesh’s flame

the body’s silver specie
a music in my mind
ghost-music, -specie
can’t be your mirror, I
cheats death again

the root & its entourage
ark-in-the-forest,
zither-      lit & -strung

don your ghost-uniform
muster me in cyme-
light, marrow-light,
unbide my tender service

untitled (specimen dowry)

Pearl pearl be my docent—

the green wedge
attests—&, the singing cleat—

I have many secret debts—

The human body is a system—

the dream sweeps
through, & puts music away—

my life in the great courts

 

*

to address the least durable moment—
trace-protection
a mythos conferred, heavy gender
weighting the forest’s punctum—

faith’s
     same four notes in the understory—

manna

shelter-vessel, the medulla’s gray star

      the copper pit in which I face you
shifts aside, lobed with the literal—

extraction’s logic: adduce vs adjourn
—my tasting-garment, fragrant hyphae

stoop to murmur        in flood of thee

G.C. Waldrep’s most recent books are a long poem, Testament (BOA Editions, 2015), and a chapbook, Susquehanna (Omnidawn, 2013). With Joshua Corey he edited The Arcadia Project: North American Postmodern Pastoral (Ahsahta, 2012). His new collection, feast gently, is due out from Tupelo Press in 2018. He lives in Lewisburg, Pa., where he teaches at Bucknell University, edits the journal West Branch, and serves as Editor-at-Large for The Kenyon Review.

Editors’ Notes (Posit 13)

 

Spring may be imminent, but, as will likely be the case for some time to come, this issue of Posit arrives in less-than-optimistic times. However, once again, the work in this issue has the potential to address, and even salve, our pervasive distress, in ways that are no less satisfying for being indirect. Much of the art in this issue is about making — and all of it makes the case for the value of its having been made. Which is to say, for the value of art itself — not as luxury, as the current US regime might have it — but as emotional, intellectual necessity. One facet of which is its uncanny capacity to speak to situations that did not exist when it was created. Although the poetry and prose in this issue was written before the advent of the current political crisis, many of these pieces find a way to speak to it. Thus, that “we have somehow, / in haste and hubris, walked / into a deep night” is, unfortunately, incontestable (Matthew Burns, The Border). As is the fact that “even sanity ain’t sane today” (Anselm Berrigan, Degrets). Or that we are asked to believe that “once spoken, every word is true, even / all the words yoked to great chains of lies” (Gregory Crosby, The Marquis of Sad).

Happily, the works in this issue also have “a harmony that makes us forget the incontestable” (Dennis Barone, Vast Oculus). For one thing, we are reminded “not to fear the truth, to understand the neighbor, the houses, and this land” (Vast Oculus). And we are offered the grave and ethereal beauty of G.C. Waldrep’s “root & its entourage / ark-in-the-forest, / zither-lit & -strung” (first person). We are exhorted, with ringing, if enigmatic, energy, to “substitute optimistically!” (Rae Armantrout, Going Somewhere). Which I take the liberty of interpreting, at least in part, as an injunction to continue making, and imbibing, the arts, including:

Rae Armantrout’s tantalizing chains of Delphic utterances, guiding our gaze in “the fullness of time” from the spare beauty of the resonant particulars to the universes coiled within them, bringing to mind Bashō, W. C. Williams, Hansel and Gretel, and the inspiriting newborn whose “just opened eyes / see we can’t see what;”

Dennis Barone’s Vast Oculus, opening its generous aperture from the tangible familiar to “another world . . . beyond the armchair — like the point of a rapier” in prose that captures the ultimate essence of poetry, “leap[ing] from the enormous weight” of reality to “follow ideas without bodies;”

The urgent yet playful poetics of Anselm Berrigan’s Pregrets, Degrets, and Regrets, which may not expect “fragment bump” but delivers that and more, “revers[ing] the outer corners until specific arrival” of something very much like revelation “mandates itself / into existence” despite the possibility that there may be “no time for poems / with all this e-sociology poised to bite in disparate / need of absolute paragons;”

Matthew Burns’ lithe and slender verse columns exploring absence and corporeality, boundaries and trajectories, hope and despair: “zero / being nothing / but, like / the past: / still there / and affecting” as these spare and melancholy verses;

James Capozzi’s eerily relevant evocations of the demise of the mighty, from Nimrod, “basted by the city’s voice” to the conquistadores, having lost the nerve to defend their “sham heaven” in the face of the “troubling questions” posed by the earth they have just torched;

Rob Cook’s sharp yet lyrical elegies to the existential divide between self and other, be they one’s own shadow or the companion of one’s dreams, until even “the wind is just my shadow / moving its weapons from tree to tree;”

Gregory Crosby’s aphoristic verses masterfully evoking the pathos and humor of existence in which “[a]ll this death [is] another sticky note: Live!” in a universe “so / magnanimous that it breaks your heart in two;”

Julia Leverone’s exploration of the paradoxical interdependence of creation and destruction, adhesion and repulsion, as voiced by an unregretful Medusa hoping “never to return to the beforehand” and a lover observing the “force of keeping / together against pulling away;”

Caolan Madden’s penetrating exploration of isolation, “[t]he silence, the league of witches . . . that unclaimed feeling,” along with the ambivalence of a mother who doesn’t “want to grow up I want to spoil” rather than “fold . . . up her I” “when [the baby] made [her] shape known;”

F. Daniel Rzicznek’s prose poems from Leafmold, an inventory of poetic makings, including dogs and doctors, hawks and herons, history and science, “[i]naccuacies and errata smuggled via alternate versions of this weird life” brilliantly assembled, not “to deliver something heinous . . . but a text like a free state, a paregoric of the brain;”

Alina Stefanescu’s high-octane prose pieces expanding from a sense of lived experience (insomnia, scars, selfies) to wider implications in “this era of anodyne-paradigms pocked upon our model houses” where “a promise might be less than an omen as a toothache is less than a broken jar as a head circles the room without one single landing strip in sight;”

and G.C. Waldrep’s elegant, emotionally charged jewels of melodic and depictive compression, “lobed with the literal,” in which “the dream sweeps / through, & puts music away–,” evoking worlds in each parsed and potent word — luminous worlds in which meaning and music are not only married, but inseparable.

I would also like to take this opportunity to welcome the newest member of the Posit team. Carol Ciavonne is an accomplished poet, teacher, editor, and past contributor, who promises to bring discernment, dedication, and generosity to her work as Associate Editor. We are delighted and grateful to welcome her aboard.

With thanks to you, our readers, for being here.
Susan Lewis

positInkSpash131210.small

Welcome to the visual art of Posit 13!

Nathan Brujis makes lyrical and luscious abstract paintings, loosely based on nature and autobiographical experience. Working in a rich palette of saturated colors, he weaves ribbons of form in, under, over, and around one another. These canvases hint at abstract narratives while always retaining their joyful exploration of the painting process.

The almost ritualistic patternings of Jeanne Heifetz’s drawings are hypnotic. They seem to meander across the page, yet there is always an underlying logic to the journey of her lines. Using a visual ordering system based on the branching of natural structures, her work investigates the organic growth of form and the movement of marks on paper.

Eva Kwong’s miraculous sculptures exist somewhere between the natural and fabricated worlds. Drawing upon her interest in the spiritual and visual interconnectedness of the universe, she creates beautiful objects that manage to make reference to many different realities simultaneously. Her animated sculptures delight the eye while defying categorization.

The sculptures of Greely Myatt build upon the notion of “transformation.” His impeccably crafted found and fabricated mixed-media sculptures are funny and provocative, playing with artistic and social conventions in an amusing and elegant manner. Myatt references everything from rural southern culture to contemporary art, creating both installation and intimate scale works that welcome the viewer in, with a wink and a nod.

And Brian Sargent’s deep dive photographic investigations into light and the landscape capture an eerie mood. The sky seems on the verge of dusk, the light fading… or is it about to dawn? They are full of mystery and quietude. The occasional flash of a silhouetted figure, a ghost or a vision? The choice is yours.

I hope you enjoy!
Melissa Stern

Posit’s AWP 2017 off-site reading

Co-sponsored by for Prelude, Inter/rupture, & Bone Bouquet

FEATURING:

Rae Armantrout, G.C. Waldrep, Amy King
Catherine Blauvelt, Armando Jaramillo Garcia, Lindsay Turner
Sarah Sarai, Laura Jaramillo, Dominique Salas
Eloisa Amezcua, Lucian Mattison, Caroline Crew
Hosted by Susan Lewis, Stu Watson, Curtis Perdue, & Krystal Languell

Admission: free

Saturday, February 11, 2017 3-5 PM
D.C. Arts Center, 2438 18th St NW
Washington, D.C.

awp17off-site-event-flier_yellow-new